Table of Contents
U. of Tennessee Ends Glenn Reynolds Investigation, Cites First Amendment

University of Tennessee College of Law (UT Law) Dean Melanie Wilson that law professor and noted blogger Glenn Reynolds will face âno disciplinary actionâ for his tweet (ââ) about protestors blocking an interstate highway during the recent unrest in Charlotte. I penned a blog entry last week about the tweet, the investigation, and whether Reynoldsâ comment was protected speech under the First Amendment (it was).
Today, Dean Wilson wrote:
Following Professor Glenn Reynoldsâs tweet and my public response last week, I began an investigation that included an examination of the facts, policies in the universityâs Faculty Handbook, and the law. I discussed the situation with Professor Reynolds, university leadership, and General Counsel. I also sought feedback from College of Law students, staff, faculty, the Alumni Council and Deanâs Circle, and other UT Law alumni. As a lawyer and a law school dean, I know that gathering information and upholding the principles of due process are absolutely necessary in a situation like this.
In short, no disciplinary action will be taken against Professor Reynolds. The tweet was an exercise of his First Amendment rights. Nevertheless, the tweet offended many members of our community and beyond, and I understand the hurt and frustration they feel.
You can read on UT Lawâs website.
Professor Reynolds also emailedâand UT Law has postedâa to the law school community today, saying:
Thursday one of my 580,000 tweets blew up. I try to be careful and precise in my language. I didnât do that this time, and I unfortunately made a lot of people in the law school community sad or angry, something I certainly didnât mean to do, and feel bad about.
I was following the riots in Charlotte, against a background of reports of violence, which seemed to be getting worse. Then I retweeted a report of mobs âstopping traffic and surrounding vehiclesâ with the comment ârun them down.â
Those words can be taken as encouragement of drivers going out of their way to run down protesters. I meant no such thing, and Iâm sorry it seemed to many that I did. What I meant was that drivers who feel their lives are in danger from a violent mob should not stop their vehicles. I remember Reginald Denny, a truck driver who was beaten nearly to death by a mob during the 1992 Los Angeles riots. My tweet should have said, âKeep driving,â or âDonât stop.â I was upset, and it was a bad tweet. I do not support violence except in cases of clear self-defense.
I have always strongly supported peaceful protests, and Iâve spent years speaking out against police militarization and excessive police violence in my USA TODAY columns, on my blog, and on Twitter itself. I understand why people misunderstood my tweet and regret that I was not clearer.
FIRE is glad to see the university has come to the same conclusion we did about Professor Reynoldsâ tweet, and recognizes the need for both due process and respect for faculty membersâ First Amendment rights. The University of Tennessee at Knoxville is a âgreen lightâ school according to FIREâs Spotlight speech codes rating system, and weâre glad to see that it is continuing to recognize constitutionally protected speech on its campus.
In the social media age, when expression on highly controversial topics is expected to be quick and is often character-limited, universities and other institutions need more than ever to apply First Amendment principles to both faculty and students in a consistent and just fashion.
Recent Articles
Get the latest free speech news and analysis from ĂÛÖÏăÌÒ.

FIREstatement on UT-Dallas student newspaper distribution

VICTORY! University of North Texas system lifts drag âpauseâ after ĂÛÖÏăÌÒ/ACLU of TX letter

How sure are you?
