Table of Contents
Social Work Injustice on Inside Higher Ed
մǻ岹’s Inside Higher Ed carries covering the against Missouri State University for its outrageous, ideologically based treatment of social work student Emily Brooker. The case, which was covered by our own Luke Sheahan in a blog yesterday, involves, among other things, Brooker’s being forced to write a letter to legislators supporting a political policy with which she disagreed. This is very similar to the case of social work student Bill Felkner at Rhode Island College, who was also forced to lobby the state legislature for a policy that he didn’t really support.
Those who follow ֭’s work, of course, weren’t surprised to see these abuses happen in social work schools. Last week, FIREwrote to the federal Department of Health and Human Services (HHS) about the political litmus tests endorsed by the Council for Social Work Education (CSWE)—the accrediting body for schools of social work. HHS social workers must have a degree from a CSWE-accredited school—and CSWE-accredited schools must evaluate students on their dedication to “social and economic justice,” which are undeniably controversial issues. Neither Bill Felkner nor Emily Brooker fit in with the mainstream of students at their schools of social work when it came to those issues. Is it a coincidence, then, that they were the ones punished for their beliefs?
Recent Articles
Get the latest free speech news and analysis from ֭.

Authoritarians in the Academy
Podcast
FIRE Senior Scholar discusses her new book, "" Timestamps: 00:00 Intro 01:17 Book origins 03:38 How China censored speech on American campuses 18:36 COVID's impact for international students' speech 22:05 What is sensitivity...

Act now: Condemn Indiana University’s censorship of student media
Indiana University fired its student media adviser for refusing to censor the student paper, then banned the paper’s print edition.

Pentagon’s press badge policy unites journalists by offending the Constitution
The Pentagon's press badge policy is an unconstitutional attempt to single out reporters for less favorable treatment than the general public. Thankfully, it has united outlets against the effort.

The trouble with ‘dignity’
After the assassination of Charlie Kirk, universities are navigating how to respond when community members says offensive things online. But if “dignity” becomes a rule, it stops inspiring virtue and starts enforcing conformity.