Table of Contents
Possible Lawsuit at Stanford
FIRE recently learned that FIRELegal Network attorney , who successfully sued Stanford University for its speech code in 1994, has taken up the cause of preserving door-to-door distribution of student publications on Stanford’s campus. Stanford bans door-to-door distribution of literature unless hall residents specifically vote to endorse it, and the conservative Stanford Review, whose editors have long distributed their issues door-to-door, has The Stanford Progressive in objecting to the current state of affairs. Review editors have refused to abide by Stanford’s policy and are currently facing sanctions. All of this has led Corry to threatening a lawsuit unless the ban on door-to-door distribution is overturned. His reasoning, to those uninitiated in the peculiarities of California, relies upon the Golden State’s unique Leonard Law, which requires its non-religious private universities to act as if they are bound by the First Amendment.
Recent Articles
Get the latest free speech news and analysis from ÃÛÖÏãÌÒ.
The federal charges against Don Lemon raise serious concerns for press freedom
Don Lemon faces federal charges after entering a Minnesota church with disruptive protesters to cover the event. What does this mean for press freedom and First Amendment rights?
The American people fact-checked their government
When states lie, crowds can correct. From Paris 1961 to Minneapolis 2026, smartphones and Community Notes expose power’s lies in real time.
California prohibits its teachers from talking about a student's gender identity to their parents. That raises First Amendment concerns.
California barred teachers from telling parents about kids’ gender identity. A federal court balked. Now SCOTUS may weigh in.
Facing mass protests, Iran relies on familiar tools of state violence and internet blackouts
From Iran’s internet blackouts to Australia’s expanding hate laws, governments worldwide are tightening control over speech and dissent.