Table of Contents
Linfield University finally drops bogus investigation of professor who still doesnât know the allegations against her

Linfield University dropped its investigation into Professor Reshmi Dutt-Ballerstadt (pictured) for her social media posts that praised English majors and criticized the business schoolâs takeover of the building housing the English department. (Photo courtesy Professor Dutt-Ballerstadt)
Almost a month after Linfield University launched an investigation into English professor Reshmi Dutt-Ballerstadt, the university says the investigation is over and that it will take no further action. Dutt-Ballerstadt, however, still doesnât know the universityâs justification for investigating her.
The welcome development in this vexing case comes less than a week after the American Association of University Professors released a calling the conditions of academic freedom and shared governance at Linfield âdeplorable,â and following two letters and continuous criticism from FIREfor violating faculty expressive and due process rights. Although Linfield is a private university and is thus not obligated to promise faculty freedom of speech, the university has made to faculty that they enjoy expressive freedoms. Having made these promises, Linfield must uphold expressive rights.
Linfield has proven itself a truly bad actor when it comes to respecting facultyâs expressive and due process rights.
As FIREpreviously reported, Linfield told Dutt-Ballerstadt an outside entity would investigate her after she made social media posts noting tension between Linfieldâs English department and business school that resulted in complaints to the university. After FIREcriticized the unwarranted investigation into clearly protected speech, Linfieldâs outside counsel claimed there was more to the matter, but refused to share any additional information about the basic nature of the allegations with either FIREor Dutt-Ballerstadt herself, citing Linfieldâs asserted concerns for the complainantâs privacy.
Linfield failed to respond to ĂÛÖÏăÌÒâs follow-up letter explaining that, to comport with the most basic conception of due process, it must provide Dutt-Ballerstadt notice of what she allegedly did.
Yesterday, amid from the AAUP report, Linfield informed Dutt-Ballerstadt that sheâs no longer under investigation â but still wonât tell her the basis for the investigation in the first place. In its , the university said it was investigating âa series of events ⊠in TJ Hallâ and âon social media that were unprofessional.â In its letter to Dutt-Ballerstadt yesterday, the university changed its story, saying it received complaints that she created a hostile work environment.
Weâre glad Linfield backed off. But its significant violations of core tenets of free speech and due process â opening an investigation into a professorâs clearly protected speech, noting her âparticipation will be required,â and all the while refusing to tell her the reasons for the investigation so she might prepare a defense to any misconduct charges â are unacceptable.
This situation, along with previous denials of due process and expressive freedom, certainly chilled faculty expression at Linfield, and will continue to do so until it publicly recommits to respecting faculty rights.
The AAUPâs detailed Linfieldâs failings in its firing of tenured professor Daniel Pollack-Pelzner without due process for comments critical of the university. The report Linfield has an eroding system of shared governance, âwhich has jeopardized the facultyâs exercise of academic freedom and contributed to a culture of abuse.â
In June, the AAUP will vote on whether to recommend adding Linfield to its infamous list of . This year, FIREadded Linfield to our own list: the 10 Worst Colleges for Free Speech.
Linfield has proven itself a truly bad actor when it comes to respecting facultyâs expressive and due process rights. FIREwill continue to fight back against the universityâs misdeeds until faculty there can be confident Linfield will keep the important promises it makes.
FIRE defends the rights of students and faculty members â no matter their views â at public and private universities and colleges in the United States. If you are a student or a faculty member facing investigation or punishment for your speech, submit your case to FIREtoday. If youâre faculty member at a public college or university, call the Faculty Legal Defense Fund 24-hour hotline at 254-500-FLDF (3533). If youâre a college journalist facing censorship or a media law question, call the Student Press Freedom Initiative 24-hour hotline at 717-734-SPFI (7734).
Recent Articles
Get the latest free speech news and analysis from ĂÛÖÏăÌÒ.

FIREstatement on UT-Dallas student newspaper distribution

VICTORY! University of North Texas system lifts drag âpauseâ after ĂÛÖÏăÌÒ/ACLU of TX letter

How sure are you?
