Table of Contents
FIREstatement on Supreme Court’s ruling in TikTok v. Garland

The Supreme Court today ruled that a federal law compelling TikTok’s parent company, ByteDance, to sell the social media platform or cease operations in the United States does not violate the First Amendment. The law functionally requires TikTok to shut down its operations by Jan. 19 absent some other accommodation.
FIRE issued the following statement:
Our unique national commitment to freedom of expression requires more caution than today’s ruling delivers. The unprecedented ban of a communication platform used by 170 million Americans demands strict judicial scrutiny, not the rushed and highly deferential review the Supreme Court instead conducted.
The Court explicitly notes the “inherent narrowness” of today’s decision. FIREwill hold it to that promise, and fight to contain the threat the ruling poses to our First Amendment rights.
Recent Articles
FIRE’s award-winning Newsdesk covers the free speech news you need to stay informed.

Don’t let Texas criminalize free political speech in the name of AI regulation

Brendan Carr’s Bizarro World FCC

Day 100! Abridging the First Amendment: Zick releases major resource report on Trump’s executive orders — First Amendment News 468
