Table of Contents
FIREstatement on Office for Civil Rights’ use of ‘anti-Semitism’ definition
FIRE is deeply disappointed by the of the Department of Education’s Office for Civil Rights (OCR) to into a 2011 complaint against Rutgers University utilizing a definition of anti-Semitism that threatens speech protected by the First Amendment. The definition’s inherent vagueness allows for the investigation and punishment of core political speech. This is an unacceptable result.
FIRE has clearly and consistently opposed the use of this problematic definition in both university policy and legislation at the state and federal level. We do so again today.
Recent Articles
Get the latest free speech news and analysis from ÃÛÖÏãÌÒ.
Three takeaways from Harvard’s victory over the Trump administration’s funding freeze
If the government is going to punish universities for violating the law, then it must do so lawfully.
FIREstatement on ruling that Trump’s funding freeze for Harvard was unlawful
The Trump administration trampled Harvard University’s First Amendment rights and broke civil rights law when it yanked billions in federal grants and contracts over alleged Title VI violations.
New campus censorship hack turns trademark law into muzzle
Gallaudet University muzzled a student org’s social media account. Then FIREand Meta stepped in.
LAWSUIT: Texas bans the First Amendment at public universities after dark
FIREfiled a lawsuit today to stop enforcement of a new, unconstitutional law that turns every public university in Texas into speech-free zones.