Table of Contents
Defend dissent! — FAN 331
Marina Ovsyannikova's anti-war protest during a Russian state television network's live broadcast.
FAN is on spring break and will return next week. In the meantime, here is the full “Academic Speech — Protected or Perilous?” series:
- Ronald K. L. Collins, “ACLU’s David Cole Weighs in on Georgetown University Law School Controversy. Commentaries to Follow”
- Erwin Chemerinsky, “The Role of Deans and Administrators in Dealing with Offensive Speech”
- Nadine Strossen, “Some Thoughts About University Officials’ ‘Counter-Speech’”
- Burt Neuborne, “Sticks and Stones”
- Ira Glasser, “Social Justice Requires Free Speech”
- John K. Wilson, “How Suspensions Violate Academic Freedom”
- Ronald K. L. Collins, “Georgetown’s Free Speech Experiment: What’s Next?”
- Emerson Sykes, "Academic Freedom for Whom?”
Related
- Nate Hochman, ",” National Review (March 2)
Last scheduled FAN
Recent Articles
Get the latest free speech news and analysis from ֭.
Abbott’s blacklist: America’s tradition of branding dissent as treason
Texas Gov. Greg Abbott labeled the Council on American-Islamic Relations a foreign terrorist organization and prohibited it from purchasing land in the state.
FIREstatement on Pentagon investigation of video calling on troops to refuse illegal orders
The Pentagon’s actions are clear retaliation for something Sen. Kelly is entirely within his rights to say.
You can’t eliminate real-world violence by suing over online speech
With so much of our national conversation taking place online, there’s an almost reflexive tendency to search for online causes — and online solutions — when tragedy strikes in the physical world.
The case for treating adults as adults when it comes to AI chatbots
Like the communicative technologies of the past, AI has the potential to amplify human speech rather than replace it, bringing more storytellers, perspectives, and critiques with it.