Table of Contents
Greg’s Nowhere Near Definitive Outrage/Call-Out/Cancel Culture Study List

While it’s awkward to recommend so much of my own work, I had an early window into Cancel Culture because my work took place on the campuses from which the culture eventually coalesced. Thankfully, many others took up the torch after they noticed the same trends. If you want to see the rise of Cancel Culture from its origins on campus, these resources are a good place to start. And take note, these pieces all, as far as I can tell, come from perspectives ranging from the far left to the center.
- Greg Lukianoff (2014). Written quickly in the summer of 2014, this was my first detailed book into the then new and intense threats to free speech coming from college students that seemed to explode out of nowhere, starting in the fall semester of 2013.
- “,” Greg Lukianoff and Jonathan Haidt (The Atlantic, 2014). Jon and I reported on a trend we had both seen — the language of “safety” was being deployed on campus to justify deplatforming and calls for punishment of overwhelmingly political speech.
- “,” Jonathan Chait (New York Magazine, 2015). This was one of the first articles I saw from someone outside of FIREwho had noticed the change, and saw that something was wrong.
- “,” Michelle Goldberg (Slate, 2015). Michelle smartly noticed that free speech was becoming a culture war issue, and saw the risks of the left ceding “free speech” as a conservative value.
- Jon Ronson (2015). I believe this was the first full-length book describing the problem we now call “Cancel Culture.” It’s an empathetic series of case studies of victims of public shaming campaigns.
- Alice Dreger (2015). FIREfriend, former professor, and current investigative journalist Alice Dreger takes a look at what happens at the intersection of science and activism — and it looks a lot like cancellation.
- High-profile Democrats and politicians on the left have defended free expression:
- (Jan. 7, 2015).
- (Sept. 14, 2015).
- , Meet the Press (June 18, 2017).
- (Oct. 26, 2019).
- , CNN (Oct. 30, 2019).
- “The Chicago Statement”: , University of Chicago (2015). After author Dan Savage was accused of committing a “hate crime” on campus during a 2014 speech (during which Savage suggested that trans people “reclaim” the t-word; Savage describes the event in his own words ), the campus started an inquiry into freedom of expression. The result was this policy statement, which emphasizes the centrality of freedom of speech to educational institutions; many other institutions have adopted forms of it in the years since.
- (2015). Hume follows the statements of solidarity with free speech after the Charlie Hebdo massacre as they devolve into a series of caveats and exceptions, ultimately noting that many of the people who claim to support freedom of speech “want speech that is released from custody only on licence with a promise of good behavior, preferably wearing a security ankle bracelet[.]”
- (2016). This film looks at free expression through the lens of comedy, and more specifically, comedy that has faced calls for censorship, both from government censors (in the case of Lenny Bruce) and from well-meaning activists.
- Charb (2016). The late editor in chief of Charlie Hebdo, full name Stèphane Charbonnier, finished this defense of free expression two days before his 2015 murder.
- , Jean M. Twenge (2017). The most important insight of "iGen" (and there are many) is the generational shift in attitudes toward free speech documented by Twenge’s research.
- Greg Lukianoff and Jonathan Haidt (2017). This is the book that grew from the 2014 Atlantic article listed above. We are currently revisiting the topics (and data) from the book in a series in my Eternally Radical Idea blog; parts one and two are available now.
- project, (2018). The Hidden Tribes survey revealed through research what many of us suspected instinctively: The bulk of calls to cancel come from a small (8% of the population), non-diverse cohort of highly-educated, generally affluent people.
- Meghan Daum (2019). Daum wrestles with the state of culture through the lens of personal memoir with reflection and humility.
Recent Articles
FIRE’s award-winning Newsdesk covers the free speech news you need to stay informed.

FIREstatement on Free Speech Coalition v. Paxton upholding age verification for adult content
Today, the Supreme Court ruled 6-3 to uphold Texas's age-verification law for sites featuring adult content, effectively reversing decades of Supreme Court precedent that protects the free speech rights of adults to access information without jumping over government age-verification hurdles.

Orchestrated silence: How one of America’s most elite music schools expelled a student for reporting harassment
Rebecca Bryant Novak earned her spot at one of the world’s top music schools. But after reporting her advisor for harassment, she says the school turned on her. Now FIREis demanding answers.

FIREto court: AI speech is still speech — and the First Amendment still applies
Is AI-generated speech speech? In a new amicus brief, FIREsays yes — and warns that when it comes to free speech and emerging tech, early missteps can echo for decades.

Voters want AI political speech protected – and lawmakers should listen
New polling shows voters fear AI — but fear government censorship more. As lawmakers push new rules, are they protecting elections or silencing speech?