Table of Contents
Best of Newsdesk: Censored at DePaul
EDITOR’S NOTE: This post is part of ֭’s annual “Best of Newsdesk” retrospective, where we search the archives to bring you stories worth a second look.
We hope you’ll check out our unique interactive feature on the ongoing censorship crisis at DePaul University, which FIREfirst published March 24.
Recent Articles
Get the latest free speech news and analysis from ֭.
VICTORY: Federal court halts Texas’ ‘no First Amendment after dark’ campus speech ban
A federal judge issued a preliminary injunction blocking the University of Texas from enforcing a law that bans virtually all free speech on public university campuses after dark
Pentagon’s press badge policy unites journalists by offending the Constitution
The Pentagon's press badge policy is an unconstitutional attempt to single out reporters for less favorable treatment than the general public. Thankfully, it has united outlets against the effort.
The trouble with ‘dignity’
After the assassination of Charlie Kirk, universities are navigating how to respond when community members says offensive things online. But if “dignity” becomes a rule, it stops inspiring virtue and starts enforcing conformity.
California wants to make platforms pay for offensive user posts. The First Amendment and Section 230 say otherwise.
California’s SB 771 would punish platforms for users’ speech — a clear First Amendment and Section 230 violation that would chill online expression.